Which of the following statements is true regarding non-lethal force?

The statement that non-lethal force is a preferred option when lethal force is not justified is accurate because it highlights the principle of using the least amount of force necessary to manage a situation effectively. Non-lethal force is designed to incapacitate an individual or control a situation without causing permanent damage or death, making it an appropriate choice when there is no immediate threat to life that would warrant lethal action.

In contexts where the use of lethal force cannot be justified—such as when there is an opportunity to de-escalate a conflict or manage a situation peacefully—non-lethal options should be prioritized. This approach not only aligns with legal and ethical standards but also aids in preserving life and maintaining public trust.

The other statements do not accurately reflect the principles of non-lethal force. For instance, employing non-lethal force without assessment could lead to unnecessary escalation or harm; it’s important to evaluate the situation first. Furthermore, non-lethal force is not limited to domestic law enforcement and can be applicable in various scenarios, including military contexts, under specific rules of engagement. Lastly, while non-lethal options should be considered in military strategy, they are not a one-size-fits-all solution and might not always be the first choice depending on the circumstances