What type of weapons can be used if necessary to control a situation?

The choice of non-lethal weapons as the appropriate option for controlling a situation aligns with the principles of proportionality and necessity outlined in the Standing Rules for the Use of Force (SRUF). Non-lethal weapons are designed to minimize injury and harm while still allowing law enforcement or security personnel to exercise control over potentially dangerous situations. This approach prioritizes the safety of both the officers and the individuals involved, reflecting a standard practice aimed at resolving conflicts without resorting to lethal means unless absolutely necessary.

Using non-lethal options helps to manage situations effectively and reduces the risk of escalation that can arise from the use of more harmful tactics. This is particularly relevant in scenarios where the objective is to de-escalate tension rather than to incapacitate or permanently harm an individual.

Lethal force, as mentioned in one of the choices, is only justified under strict circumstances where there is an imminent threat to life, making it a last resort rather than a standard option. The reference to any personal weapon available is too broad and fails to recognize the need for an appropriate and measured response. The idea of using force that is "too strong to be resisted" also conflicts with principles of controlled engagement and could lead to excessive force, which is not justifiable under SR