What should be prioritized before using deadly force according to the guidelines?

The guidelines emphasize that before resorting to deadly force, all lesser means of resolving a situation should be thoroughly exhausted. This prioritization underscores the principle of proportionality and the importance of using the least amount of force necessary to achieve a lawful objective. By exploring and implementing alternative options—such as de-escalation techniques, verbal warnings, or non-lethal methods—officers can often diffuse a potentially violent situation without the need to resort to deadly measures.

Evaluating verbal warnings aligns with this principle as an important part of the process, but it is just one method among many that should be considered before deadly force is contemplated. Thanking individuals involved or seeking political approval does not relate directly to the immediate need to resolve a potentially violent encounter and would distract from prioritizing safety and the proper use of force. Therefore, ensuring all lesser means have been exhausted is critical to upholding the values of restraint and judgment in the use of force within law enforcement contexts.