What procedure should follow a use of force incident according to the SRUF guidelines?

Following a use of force incident, conducting an after-action review to assess compliance with the Standing Rules for the Use of Force (SRUF) is the appropriate procedure. This review is essential for evaluating the incident in detail, ensuring that all actions taken were aligned with established guidelines and standards. It facilitates a thorough analysis of what happened during the incident, determining whether the use of force was justified, proportional, and in adherence to the SRUF criteria.

In this context, the after-action review also serves as an opportunity to identify any training needs, procedural adjustments, or policy revisions that may arise from the incident. This continuous improvement process is critical for maintaining accountability and enhancing future responses to similar situations.

The other options do not align with the structured and comprehensive approach required by SRUF guidelines. Informing the media or making a public statement may be necessary at some point, but these actions do not contribute directly to scrutinizing and learning from the incident itself. Conducting a confidential review could be beneficial, but it lacks the focus on compliance and learning that the after-action review encompasses. Therefore, it is the after-action review that truly captures the essence of reflecting on and improving the procedures related to the use of force.