Under what circumstance may a soldier use deadly force against a vehicular threat?

A soldier may use deadly force against a vehicular threat when the vehicle presents an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm (DSBH) to themselves or others. This standard ensures that the use of deadly force is justified only when there is a clear and immediate danger that necessitates such a response.

When assessing threats, it's critical to identify situations where the actions of a driver or vehicle pose a genuine risk. The imminent threat must be evident and cannot be based on assumptions or general behavior of the vehicle. Each situation must be evaluated with regard to the potential for loss of life or severe injury, as the justification for using deadly force hinges on protecting oneself and others from such severe outcomes.

In contrast, other circumstances listed do not meet the criteria for using lethal measures. For example, a vehicle being authorized to enter does not imply any threat, merely that it has permission. Similarly, if the driver appears lost, there is no indication that they are intentionally putting anyone at risk. Lastly, a vehicle speeding through a checkpoint could potentially be a concern but does not automatically suggest an imminent threat of DSBH; the context would need to be fully assessed before determining whether deadly force is warranted.